Tag Archives: third parties

Mittens’ binders full o’ women, Barack’s back, and other thoughts

Updated below

Damn is the Internet fast.

Mittens Romney claimed during tonight’s presidential debate that when he became governor of Massachusetts, he was dismayed by the fact that the applicants for his cabinet positions were overwhelmingly (or entirely) male. So, he said, he had his staffers compile for him “binders full of women” candidates so that he could put some women on his cabinet.

“Binders full of women” struck me as an awful — some might say “inelegant” — way to put it, and I wasn’t alone. Already “binders full of women” has gone viral:

Romney

Romney

Romney

Romney

More here and a lot more here.

It’s funny how someone inadvertently can reveal his or her true feelings about a group of people, isn’t it? I have a co-worker whose word choice routinely (very apparently unwittingly) reveals her homophobia/heterosexism, and here is Mittens claiming to wuv women yet talking about them as though they were objects to be stored in binders.

Condescension and objectification — that’s the way to win the women’s vote, Mittens!

Speaking of women, this is probably the only news that my favorite presidential candidate, the Green Party’s Jill Stein, is going to make: That she and her running mate were arrested for disorderly conduct while trying to enter the presidential debate hall in New York today.

I love the Green Party and we’re long overdue for a woman in the Oval Office, but um

Here is a photo of Stein and her running mate right before their arrest:

IMG_1194

LongIslandReport.org photo

Don’t get me wrong — I disagree with the partisan duopoly that we have in the Coke Party and the Pepsi Party, and it long has rankled me that third parties are shut out of the presidential debates, preserving the partisan duopoly, but I don’t see that this tactic of the sit-down from the 1960s works.

I mean, in politics image is everything, and looking like you are members of the Occupy movement — and I support the Occupy movement (I’ve given money to my local Occupy movement, in fact) — may not be the best image to project.

Just sayin’.

I’m not saying that Stein did something wrong, that she doesn’t have a point, that she isn’t the victim of injustice.

I’m saying that it (apparently orchestrating your own arrest for disorderly conduct) probably isn’t the best way to project power. I’m saying that it looks a bit lame and weak, and that not many people want to be part of a group that is perceived to be lame and weak, and so that therefore, it probably can’t be a great recruitment tool.

I had hoped that the Green Party would really take off after 2000, but it has only languished. I suspect that the best way to change the Democratic Party — to make it actually progressive and to make it actually for the people (and no, corporations are not people) — is to infiltrate it, much like the “tea party” fascists infiltrated the Repugnican Party, which I now routinely call the Repugnican Tea Party, since the “tea party” Nazis were so successful in infiltrating the party.

It just seems easier to re-form (not “reform” but re-form) an existing party that has gone astray than to try to to make it on your own as a third party…

Not to let Barack Obama off of the hook.

His campaign included this image in another of its endless fundraising e-mails that it sent tonight, just after the debate:

Got his back

You’re supposed to click on the image in the e-mail, which then oh-so-helpfully diverts you to a user-friendly fundraising web page.

The e-mail, titled “Get Barack’s back,” reminds me of an editorial cartoon that I saw recently in which a man reading a newspaper remarks to his wife of Obama, “I thought he was supposed to have my back!”

My sentiments exactly. This Cult of Obama thing, in which it’s our “duty” to “have Obama’s back” — it’s a real reversal of the idea of the public servant, isn’t it?

Seriously, though, is it, “Ask not what we can do for our country, but ask what we can do for Barack Obama”?

It’s a turn-off for this left-winger.

And truly, I wouldn’t be so put off by the command to “Get Barack’s back” if for these past three-plus years, after I gave him hundreds of dollars and my vote for his 2008 campaign, I felt much more strongly that he had mine.

Update: Some more women-in-binders-themed images from the Tumblr site titled “Binders Full of Women”:

“One for the Dark Lord on his dark throne. In the Land of Romney where the shadows lie he can lie.”

Overly Attached Girlfriend on Binders

This one, from elsewhere, though, is probably the funniest one that I’ve seen thus far:

And the Internet is abuzz with the report that Mittens lied even about his binders-full-o’-women story. (I had doubts about his story, which is why, when I wrote about his claim, I called it a claim. [Seriously, though, the man lies so fucking much that if he told me the sky were blue, I’d check it out.]) 

The report is that a women’s advocacy group had started to create the binders containing profiles of female candidates for high-ranking Massachussetts state government posts before it was even known whether Mittens or the Democratic gubernatorial candidate would win the election, and that Team Mittens was simply given the binders after Mittens won — making Mittens’ claim that he had his staff seek out the binders full o’ women at his direction (because the wuvs the womens so much) yet another fucking Mittens LIE.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Why I’m voting for Ralph Nader

Consumer activist and independent presidential candidate Ralph ...

Independent presidential candidate Ralph Nader speaks at a rally ...

Reuters and AFP photos

Progressive independent presidential candidate Ralph Nader speaks at a rally on Wall Street last month. If you live in a state that Barack Obama undoubtedly will win on Tuesday, you strongly should consider casting your vote for Nader.

The latest Field Poll has Barack Obama at 55 percent in California, 22 percent over Repugnican John Fossil Fool McCain, who polls at only 33 percent in my great blue home state.

Notes the Associated Press of the California poll:

If the poll accurately reflects the outcome on Election Day, it would be the most lopsided presidential election in California since Democrat Franklin Roosevelt beat Republican Alfred Landon by 35 percentage points in 1936.

The [Field Poll] results are similar to a Public Policy Institute of California Poll released last week, which had Obama leading McCain by 23 points.

So it seems pretty safe to vote for Ralph Nader on Tuesday, since, as way too many Americans don’t know, 48 of the 50 states are winner-takes-all states, which means that in such a state as California, which Obama undoubtedly is going to win by more than 50 percent, if you vote for anyone for president other than Obama, your vote kind of does and kind of doesn’t really count (but mostly, it appears, doesn’t).

Since Obama’s victory in California is a foregone conclusion, I might as well vote for the candidate whose philosophy most closely matches mine.

I’ve given Obama hundreds of dollars, mostly to knock DINO (Democrat in name only) Billary Cunton out of the race during the overlong primary season.

I’d vote for Obama, but again, his victory in California is a done deal, so casting my vote for him would be redundant, to put it mildly, and as a gay man I still can’t get over Obama’s assertion that the legality of same-sex marriage should be determined by each state.* We don’t allow each state to determine other civil rights or voting rights, for fuck’s sake.

I have Obama’s back where it comes to racial equality; where it comes to equality related to sexual orientation, I don’t see that he has my back.

Nader does — he is a full supporter of legalized same-sex marriage in all of the states — and lest you think that I’m a one-issue voter, a President Nader would do at least two very important things that neither a President Obama or a President McCainosaurus would do, and that is to check the bloated military industrial complex, which is stealing billions and billions of our tax dollars while our nation rots from within, and to put the corporations, whose crimes and abuses are tantamount to treason, in check, something that the Democratic Party, which is still too beholden to corporate money, is only half-heartedly and half-assedly willing to do.

My vote for Nader on Tuesday will be a tiny little message to the Democratic Party that it has a considerable way to go to fully distinguish itself from the Repugnican Party.

If you live in a battleground state, though, I recommend voting for Barack Obama.

However, the pundits don’t expect any of the third-party presidential candidates to have anything but a negligible effect on the race between Obama and the McCainosaurus.

*White supremacist Strom Thurmond was a third-party candidate and the name of his party was States’ Rights Democrats. So it’s rather unsettlingly surreal that Barack Obama would argue “states’ rights” where it comes to gay rights. I’ve written about black homophobes before and Salon.com also recently ran an article on that topic

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized