Tag Archives: Republican Lite

Bernie stands above the hate fest of Billary and Trump supporters

Of the three presidential candidates still standing, only Bernie Sanders’ nationwide favorability ratings are positive rather than negative — both Donald Trump and Billary Clinton are disliked more than they are liked by the American electorate by double digits — and Bernie does the best of the three in presidential-election match-up polls: Billary beats Trump by around 6 percent to 7 percent, whereas Bernie beats Trump by around 12 percent to 13 percent. This past week a poll showed that about half of Billary’s supporters primarily just want her to block Trump’s election and about half of Trump’s supporters primarily just want him to block Billary’s. (See the graph below.) Sanders is the strongest remaining presidential candidate, hands down, and I support him and only him to the end.

I’m still a Berner. From the house gathering for him that I attended in my California neighborhood in late July of last year on a sweltering summer day to Bernie’s rally that I plan to attend in my area tomorrow evening to the vote that I will cast for him on my ballot that I should receive in the mail this coming week, I support Bernie and no other candidate for the Democratic Party presidential nomination and for the White House.

No, even the specter of President Donald Trump isn’t enough to induce me to flush my conscience down the toilet and support Repugnican Lite Billary Clinton in any way whatsofuckingever.

Der Fuehrer Trump is a fascist piece of shit, but a President Trump would be exactly what Americans deserve for our long-standing dereliction of civic duty, just as we deserved George W. Bush. (When Gee Dubya & Co. blatantly stole the 2000 presidential election we, the people, should have rioted in the streets, but we did not, so we got such things as 9/11, the Vietraq War, Hurricane Katrina [its preventable deaths of between 1,000 and 2,000 people, disproportionately black and poor, I mean] and another nationwide economic collapse under a George Bush.)

The 2016 presidential race on the Repugnican Tea Party side is settled, but on the Democratic side, at least on paper, it remains unsettled.

With nine more states (including the biggest state, California, my home state) and the District of Columbia to go, right now Billary’s lead in estimated pledged delegates (delegates earned in the primary elections and caucuses) is 291 over Bernie, 1,708 to 1,417. That’s 45.3 percent of the pledged delegates for Bernie and 54.7 percent of them for Billary. (The so-called super-delegates can’t vote until the party’s convention in late July; it takes 2,383 delegates to win the nomination, and Billary is about 675 delegates away from that.)

That there is only a 9 percent difference in the number of pledged delegates between Bernie and Billary demonstrates how weak Billary is within her own party. If there were overwhelming love for Billary within her own fucking party, she’d be doing much better than 9 percent against Bernie right now.

And outside of the Democratic Party — and the Billarybots forget or ignore that there is a world outside of their own center-right/pro-plutocratic/anti-populist/sellout bubble — Billary is much less popular.

Every poll of Americans nationwide taken within the past several months shows that more dislike Billary than like her, usually by double digits. Indeed, the Huffington Post’s average of favorability polls of Billary has her at 54 percent unfavorable to 42 percent favorable, putting her underwater by 12 percentage points.

Trump’s nationwide popularity is even lower than is Billary’s — HuffPo’s average of favorability polls of Trump has him at 60 percent unfavorable to only 36 percent favorable, leaving him 24 percentage points in the hole — but Billary still doesn’t do well enough against Trump in presidential match-up polls.

Real Clear Politics’ average of match-up polls has Billary beating Trump by only 6.5 percent, and HuffPo’s average similarly has Billary beating Trump by only 6.7 percent.

There is a lot of time between now and November, I hear the chorus of Billarybots whine-sing, but both Billary and Trump are well known, having been on the national scene for decades. I don’t see room for a lot of change in the current polling numbers, and Billary’s lead over Trump of only 6 percent to 7 percent is too close for comfort.

Bernie Sanders, on the other hand, has polled more favorably than unfavorably in every poll taken this year, and HuffPo’s average of favorability polls of Bernie has him at 53 percent favorable to 40 percent unfavorable — he’s 13 percent in the black to Billary’s being 12 percent in the red, and her being negative 12 and his being positive 13 puts him at 25 percentage points ahead of her in the likability/favorability department.

Bernie Sanders hands down is the nationwide electorate’s most liked of the three presidential candidates left standing.

That’s a compelling reason for him to stay in the race through the late-July Democratic Party convention, as are his poll numbers against Trump: Real Clear Politics’ average of match-up polls has Bernie beating Trump by 13.4 percent and HuffPo’s average has Bernie beating Trump by 11.5 percent — he does about twice as better against Trump as does Billary.

So unpopular are both Billary and Trump, in fact, that this past week it was reported that about half of those who plan to vote for Billary just want to stop Trump, and about half of those who plan to vote for Trump just want to stop Billary.*

This is called the “anti-vote” and “negative partisanship,” of which Larry Sabato, director of the University of Virginia’s Center for Politics, recently remarked, “If we were trying to maximize the effect [of negative partisanship], we couldn’t have found better nominees than Trump and Clinton.”

Along with the “anti-vote” and “negative partisanship,” we have the lesser-of-two-evils-ism that has gripped our presidential politics for some time now.

We can do and we should do much better than this. Supporting Billary because she’s the lesser of the two evils only perpetuates the problem; it doesn’t resolve it.

And again, Donald Trump is just the natural karmic result of our dereliction of civic duty — as is Repugnican Lite/Democrat in name only Billary Clinton — and when we have only one presidential candidate still standing who is favored by more Americans than he is disfavored by them, if we don’t put him into the White House but allow Trump or the not-lesser-enough evil Billary into the White House, again, we will get, as we did with George W. Bush, exactly what we deserve.

*Reports Reuters:

… About 47 percent of Trump supporters said [in a Reuters/Ipsos poll released Thursday] they backed him primarily because they don’t want Clinton to win. Another 43 percent said their primary motivation was a liking for Trump’s political positions, while 6 percent said they liked him personally.

Similar responses prevailed among Clinton supporters.

About 46 percent said they would vote for her mostly because they don’t want to see a Trump presidency, while 40 percent said they agreed with her political positions, and 11 percent said they liked her personally.

The April 29-May 5 poll included 469 likely Trump voters and 599 likely Clinton voters. It has a credibility interval of 5 percentage points. (For results, click tmsnrt.rs/1TLCbqX) …

Look at that — only 11 percent of Clinton voters say they’ll vote for her because they actually like her, while a whopping 46 percent say they plan to vote for her primarily to stop Trump.

This is what the Democratic Party (and, to be fair, our national politics) has come to.

Finally, while Bernie Sanders’ supporters have not, to my knowledge, similarly been polled as to why they support him, I’m confident that if they were, you’d see results that are quite different from the similar results that Billary and Trump received.

I surmise that Bernie’s political positions and likability would come in at the top two reasons (in either order) and that blocking another candidate from winning the White House would come in third.

For me it would be his policy positions at No. 1, his likability at No. 2, and blocking either Billary or The Donald from winning the White House at No. 3 (although No. 3 might come in close behind No. 2 for me).

I confidently can say that I support Bernie primarily for Bernie and for what he stands for (and does not stand for) — and that I primarily support him not just to block another candidate, as is the case with about half of Billary’s and Trump’s supporters, who appear to be driven as much by hatred and fear of the opponent than by any fondness for their own candidate.

Advertisements

2 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

Live-blogging the fourth Dem debate

FILE - In this Oct. 13, 2015, file photo, Democratic presidential candidates Hillary Clinton, right, and Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., speak during the Democratic presidential debate in Las Vegas. Taunted by Republicans to declare war on “radical Islamic terrorism,” Democrats are turning to an unlikely ally: George W. Bush. President Barack Obama, under pressure to be more aggressive on terrorism, regularly cites his predecessor’s refusal to demonize Muslims or play into the notion of a clash between Islam and the West. As Clinton put it, “George W. Bush was right.” And, Sanders visited a mosque this month in a show of solidarity that evoked Bush’s visit to a Muslim center just days after 9/11. (AP Photo/John Locher, File)

Associated Press photo

U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders and former U.S. Secretary of State Billary Clinton spar during the first Democratic Party presidential debate in October. Polls right now have Billary with only a 4-point lead over Bernie in Iowa, which caucuses on February 1, and Bernie with a 6-point lead over Billary in New Hampshire, whose presidential primary election is on February 9.

The fourth Democratic Party presidential debate of this cycle is scheduled for tonight at 6 p.m. Eastern Time, via NBC. The debate takes place in South Carolina, which is friendly ground for Billary, who is big in the South, since she isn’t a progressive but is a Repugnican Lite.

I’ll be live-blogging tonight’s debate, using California (Pacific) time (we’re three hours ahead of Eastern Time).

This is the final Dem debate before the Iowa caucuses on February 1, which are 15 days from today.

Right now, Real Clear Politics’ average of polls has Billary Clinton’s national lead at 12.7 percent over Bernie Sanders’, and the Huffington Post’s average of polls has Billary up by 16 percent nationally.

However, the nation won’t vote on one day, but states will vote over the course of several weeks; and the earlier states’ results will affect the subsequent states’ results in a domino effect.

On that note, RCP’s average of Iowa polling right now has Billary at only 4 percent ahead of Bernie. Ditto for HuffPo. Team Billary must be panicking, and I’m expecting Billary to act desperately tonight, because she has to be desperate, and when she’s desperate, as she was against Barack Obama in 2008, she incredibly stupidly attacks her primary opponent from the right, apparently not understanding the Democratic Party primary voter (and caucus-goer).

Also, as Rachel Maddow recently put it when she had Billary on her show, Team Billary as of late has been attacking Bernie, who “doesn’t have an enemy in the world in the Democratic Party.” (Kudos to Maddow for not kowtowing to and cowering before Billary’s Being A Woman!; every legitimate criticism of Billary that a male dares to utter immediately is branded by the Billarybots as “sexism” or “misogyny” or “mansplaining” or the like.)

Recent polls (which I’ll define as reputable nationwide polls taken within the past month) unanimously show that Billary is disliked by more people than she is liked, whereas the opposite is true for Bernie, so yeah, a candidate whose favorability already is upside down attacking his or her opponent whose favorability already is right-side up probably is making a mistake.

But I digress. (That said, I hope that Billary is a raging harpy tonight; it will only harm her further.)

In New Hampshire, RCP right now has Bernie beating Billary by 6.2 percent, and HuffPo has Bernie beating her by 6 percent, so I’d be surprised if Bernie doesn’t win New Hampshire, regardless of the outcome of Iowa.

Again, I rather doubt that Billary could survive losing both Iowa and New Hampshire to Bernie.

If Bernie accomplishes that, we will see a nationwide phenomenon in which weak Billary supporters (and there are, I surmise, millions of them) seriously and significantly will reevaluate their choice of Democratic Party presidential candidate.

And, again, if Bernie wins both of the first two states, Billary no doubt will act in ways which will only make even more people dislike her. (Seriously, she’ll act much like Ellie Driver does when she loses her remaining eyeball. That isn’t attractive.)

5:45 p.m. (again, I’m using Pacific Time): The debate is scheduled to begin in 15 minutes.

5:56 p.m.: The talking heads of NBC (including Chuck Todd, whom I’ve never liked) are blathering about Bernie Sanders’ “electability” (specifically, his supposed lack thereof) even though the polls have shown for some time now that Bernie does better overall against the top three Repugnican Tea Party presidential wannabes (Donald Trump, Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio) in hypothetical match-up polls than does Billary Clinton.

Facts won’t topple the corporately owned and controlled media’s conventional “wisdom.” (And shockingly, the corporately owned and controlled media wouldn’t want a president who calls himself a “democratic socialist.”)

6:02 p.m.: The candidates are on stage now. Billary already has had some water. She must be nervous

6:04 p.m.: The opening statements are largely an obligatory tribute to Martin Luther King Jr. (due to tomorrow being MLK Day and due to the setting of the debate; I prefer spontaneously heartfelt statements to politically obligatory ones…). Bernie kind of went too quickly from MLK to his standard stump speech yet once again. (At least he’s consistent.) The maudlin Martin O’Malley reminds us of the massacre that happened in Charleston in June.

6:07 p.m.: Bernie gives “healthcare for every man, woman and child as a human right,” a $15 minimum wage, and fixing our crumbling infrastructure as the top three priorities of his White House administration were he to be elected.

Billary says she’d make pay parity between men and women one of her top three priorities, as well as renewable energy and infrastructure improvement, and says she’d improve/build on “Obamacare,” but doesn’t go nearly as far as does Sanders on that issue.

O’Malley lists strengthening labor unions among his three top priorities. I like to hear that, but he won’t win. He’s still mired in low single digits.

6:11 p.m.: Bernie reminds us that the National Rifle Association has given him a rating of “D-” for his support of its priorities, and he basically (correctly) calls Billary a liar for claiming otherwise.

6:13 p.m.: Billary retorts that Bernie has voted in favor of the NRA many times. Whether that’s true or not, as this is an awfully new-found “concern” of human weather vane on crack Billary’s, I can’t see it as anything more than politics. People have died from guns so that Billary could use their deaths to try to win the White House. Craven.

Martin O’Malley says both Bernie and Billary have been “inconsistent” on gun legislation.

Gun control is low on my list of priorities. It’s not unimportant, but we have bigger fish to fry, and I see its being raised as a big issue as an attempt by the Democratic establishment and the Billary campaign (which are the same thing, pretty much) to crowd out the more important topic of income inequality, which kills far more people than do guns (just less dramatically).

6:16 p.m.: Now the topic is white cops killing black males. The moderator brought up Walter Scott, who was shot in the back by a white cop in South Carolina as he was fleeing the cop.

Billary says one out of three black men end up incarcerated, and asks us to consider how we’d feel if one out of three white men ended up behind bars.

Bernie echoes this, stating that we disproportionately have black and Latino men behind bars, and that only China has more individuals incarcerated than does the United States.

6:19 p.m.: The moderator (Lester Holt) asks Bernie how he can win when Billary has minority support that bests him by two to one. Bernie says that when the members of the black community become more familiar with him, just as with the general population, his support among them will increase. (I concur, although I acknowledge that there are some who aren’t smart enough to vote in their own best interests, and so they’ll buy Billary’s bullshit that she’d be better for minorities than would Bernie. Never mind her husband’s “welfare reform,” NAFTA, “criminal justice” “reform,” etc., all of which have harmed minorities and which she would continue as president.)

6:23 p.m.: Bernie says that the death of anyone in police custody automatically should be investigated by the federal government. I concur. He also calls for the demilitarization of our police forces and says that the composition of our law-enforcement agencies must reflect the composition of the communities that they serve. Yup.

6:25 p.m.: Discussion on opioid overdoses and the “war on drugs” now. Bernie adds that the pharmaceutical industry shares responsibility for widespread addiction to opioids and adds that we need to improve mental health care services.

6:31 p.m.: Billary says she is committed to universal health care. She calls Obamacare a “path to universal health care.” She again says we need to “defend,” “improve” and “build on” “Obamacare.”

6:32 p.m.: Bernie again asserts that health care is a right to every human being. Twenty-nine million Americans still have no health insurance, he says, adding that the United States pays more per person for health care than does any other nation. (Yeah, that would be because of the profiteering that we see in wealth care — er, health care — here in the United States.)

6:34 p.m.: Billary again defends “Obamacare” and accuses Bernie of recently changing his plan for health care for all. “To tear it up and start over again” is “the wrong direction,” Billary proclaims of “Obamacare.” This is getting heated.

Bernie adds that not only are 29 million Americans not insured, but that many are under-insured and can’t afford their co-pays. Yup. Bernie says he has no plan to “tear up” “Obamacare.”

6:36 p.m.: Billary keeps repeating that Bernie wants us to start all over again on health care, and that we can’t do that. Sure, we can. How inspiring is Billary’s mantra, however, that we can’t. Bernie says we need to have “the guts to stand up” to the private health-care insurance industry and the pharmaceutical industry. Yup.

6:39 p.m.: Billary keeps saying we have to beef up “Obamacare.” She rejects Bernie’s plan for “Medicare for all,” saying that we couldn’t achieve that under Barack Obama, so we can’t achieve it now. Bullshit.

6:41 p.m.: Bernie says that the Democrats and Repugnicans can’t get along in Congress is a red herring for the fact that Big Money prevents most of the members of Congress from voting in the people’s best interests. Yup.

6:44 p.m.: The maudlin O’Malley is parroting the canard that we all really can hold hands and sing “Kumbaya.” We can’t. We shouldn’t. And we won’t. There are irreconcilable differences between the right and the left. There is no middle ground, for instance, on such issues as same-sex marriage (which is a constitutional right) and women’s constitutional right to control their own reproductive organs. And a “middle ground” on such a universal issue as climate change, which needs action, not even more foot-dragging in the name of “moderation,” will result in misery and death for millions if not billions of human beings around the globe (as well as the continued extinction of species and irreversible adverse planetary changes).

6:47 p.m.: When asked why Bernie has the support of young people by two to one over her, Billary stated that she’ll do her best to appeal to Bernie’s supporters. I’m one of Bernie’s many, many supporters who won’t cast a vote for or give a penny to Billary, no matter what — and that’s because while Obama said “Yes, we can,” she says “No, we can’t.” (She apparently says this for the benefit of her huge campaign contributors.) And, of course, I cannot and will not support her because she’s no progressive. She’s a pro-corporate, pro-plutocratic, centrist sellout.

6:48 p.m.: On break now. Twice O’Malley has tried to break in, but moderator Lester Holt won’t let him. Hee hee. I still wish that O’Malley would drop out already, but I don’t expect him to; he needs a job, apparently, and he apparently still is angling for veep.

6:52 p.m.: The topic is Wall Street and the big banks now. Bernie reminds us that he doesn’t take money from the big banks and doesn’t take speaking fees from Goldman Sachs. Bernie says we have to “break up these huge financial institutions” and bring back the Glass-Steagall Act.

6:53 p.m.: Billary now says that Bernie Sanders’ criticism of her having taken money from Wall Street actually impugns Barack Obama, since Obama also has taken money from Wall Street. (The “argument” there, I suppose, is that if someone else has committed the same wrong that you did, then you did not commit a wrong after all.) This is more bullshit Clintonian triangulation. This is classic Billary.

6:55 p.m.: Billary continues her line that Bernie has attacked Obama. Billary is so unpopular herself that she must try to damage Bernie by alleging that Bernie has attacked the much more popular Barack Obama. Pathetic.

6:57 p.m.: O’Malley says that Billary’s proclamation that she’d be tough on Wall Street is “not true.” He says that like Bernie and unlike Billary, he supports the reinstatement of Glass-Steagall, and he totally calls her out on trying to use Barack Obama as a human political shield, just like how in a previous debate she actually tried to use 9/11 as her justification for her coziness with the Wall Street weasels. Wonderful.

7:00 p.m.: Billary tries to deflect from her Wall-Street-boosting corruption yet once again, stating that we should look at the Repugnicans and how they are supporting the Wall Street weasels. Jesus fuck, this woman’s character is abysmal.

7:02 p.m.: Bernie says he has documented how we would pay for his ambitious agenda, including making Wall Street pay its fair share. Billary vows that as president she would not raise taxes on the middle class and also says that she has detailed how she would pay for all of her proposals.

7:04 p.m.: Bernie says that Billary’s criticism of his “Medicare-for-all, single-payer program” is a “Republican” criticism. Well, yeah, she’s a Repugnican (Lite)… Bernie says his health care plan would give Americans a significant net savings by lowering their cost for private health care. Yup. You can pay more in taxes for health care and pay much less (or even zero) for private health care and end up ahead. It’s called math.

7:08 p.m.: Climate change now. Bernie says climate change is settled. Agreed. It’s called science. For future generations we must switch from fossil fuels to sustainable energy, Bernie says.

O’Malley says we can achieve sustainable energy by 2050. Billary attempted to chime in on this important issue but just got cut off… Break now.

I’m still torn on O’Malley’s continued presence at these debates. It’s great when he calls Billary out, such as for her latest pathetic kick of trying to triangulate among her, Bernie and Obama, since she apparently feels that she has to piggyback on Obama’s popularity, but O’Malley doesn’t poll at even 3 percent nationally.

7:17 p.m.: Iran now. Bernie calls for “normalized relations with Iran.” He states that the agreement that prevents Iran from getting a nuclear weapon is a good one, and that we need to move in the direction of better relations with Iran.

Billary says we have to continue to watch Iran, that we have to watch Iran for a longer period of time before we can normalize relations with Iran.

Now Syria. Billary says she opposes American ground forces in Syria. She says she supports supporting existing militaries in the Middle East in combating the problems in Syria and in combating ISIS.

Bernie says he opposes “perpetual warfare” in the Middle East. “As president I would do everything in my power to avoid” such a(n increased) quagmire, he says.

O’Malley says, as Bernie has said, that overall he supports Obama’s current strategy in the Middle East. And he had to get maudlin again, saying that we never should refer to a soldier as “boots on the ground.” Seriously, who advises Martin the Maudlin?

7:24 p.m.: Bernie says the wealthy nations in the Middle East, like Qatar, need to do more in the Middle East to oppose ISIS and other terrorists.

7:26 p.m.: Billary is bragging about her foreign-affairs chops (she was, after all, secretary of state, and spent a lot of time advising the more popular Barack Obama in the Situation Room!).

Bernie says our first priority in the Middle East must be to destroy ISIS, and then to focus on Syria’s dictator.

7:29 p.m.: Lester Holt apparently more or less blamed the annexation of Crimea by Russia on Billary’s having been secretary of state. Meh. I don’t want Billary in the Oval Office, but I’ve always viewed Crimea as belonging to Russia, not to Ukraine. Billary has called Vladimir Putin a “bully” whom always must be stood up to.

7:32 p.m.: O’Malley is speaking in favor of privacy rights as guaranteed to us by the Constitution. Yup. O’Malley says the government must obtain a warrant to violate our privacy, and that it doesn’t matter whether it’s a privacy violation from the “front door” (that is, a more old-school privacy violation) or from the “back door,” such as via our increasingly more technologically advanced electronic devices. Yup. Yup. Yup.

Bernie says that our public policy hasn’t caught up with our technology, and I agree. We don’t give up our constitutional rights solely because we do things electronically these days. Fucktards who don’t respect others’ constitutional rights have refused to recognize this, so our laws must be updated to fully protect us from those who would violate our constitutional rights.

Billary is cut off again for the break. It does seem to me that all three candidates should have the opportunity to respond to every question, but the NBC moderators are not allowing this.

7:39 p.m.: Billary is given is a chance to address the question, but doesn’t speak in favor of our privacy rights. Hmm…

7:40 p.m.: O’Malley has attacked Donald Trump’s vilification of Muslim Americans, kind of out of nowhere. One of O’Malley’s debating tactics apparently is to try to link anecdotes to issues, but it comes off as more amateurish than anything else.

7:42 p.m.: Billary is asked how much of a role Bill Clinton would have in her economic agenda. She claims that she is undecided, but says she would use him as a “goodwill emissary” around the nation to boost her economic agenda.

7:43 p.m.: Bernie says a White House stacked with Wall Street weasels won’t accomplish much for the nation’s economy. Yup. Bernie says that his Treasury secretary wouldn’t come from Goldman Sachs. Ouch. And yup.

Bernie was baited into talking about Bill Clinton’s sexual affair with Monica Lewinsky. Bernie called Bill Clinton’s behavior in that “deplorable,” but emphasized that he didn’t want the discussion to be about Bill Clinton’s sexual behavior. Yup. (Billary, unsurprisingly, agrees…)

The corporately owned and controlled media embarrass themselves, the way that they patently pander to the lowest common denominator.

7:50 p.m.: As the debate draws to a close and the candidates are asked if there are any statements they’d like to make that they haven’t yet made, O’Malley remarks that the debate hasn’t tackled such important issues as immigration reform and the treatment of Puerto Rico by the financial weasels. He now launches into his anodyne closing statement.

Billary says she is “outraged by what’s happening in Flint, Michigan.” She points out that the city’s population, disproportionately poor and black, has been drinking contaminated water, whereas rich denizens of a city would not.

Bernie says the Repugnican Tea Party governor of Michigan should resign.

Bernie says that nothing will improve in the United States of America until Citizens United is reversed, super-PACs are abolished, and there is meaningful campaign-finance reform. Yup. Agreed: The hands of the members of Congress are tied by their Big-Money donors.

Another President Clinton would do little to nothing to solve this overarching problem. It would be more of the same: More promises, yet nothing in our lives actually improves.

7:57 p.m.: The debate is over. Like the previous three debates, I don’t see this debate changing a whole lot. That is, if you were a Billarybot before this debate, I’m sure that you’re still a Billarybot, and if you were a Berner before this debate, I’m sure that you’re still a Berner. If I had to declare a winner of this debate, I’d say that it was Bernie, but of course I’ve supported him for months, so take that for what it is.

The NBC commentators are discussing right now how Billary wrapped herself in Obama tonight. Yup. This might come back to haunt her.

Not only was it classic Clintonian triangulation, but Bernie Sanders’ supporters largely if not mostly are those of us who never forgot — and never abandoned — Barack Obama’s ubiquitous but undelivered-upon promises of “hope” and “change.”

We haven’t seen the much-promised change (not enough of it, anyway),  but we haven’t lost all hope; we still believe, after several years of disappointment, that Yes, we can. But here is Billary saying No, we can’t.

I’m not saying that she’s entirely wrong about what is and what is not achievable in D.C., but I do know that if we start off with the motto of No, we can’t, then we probably can’t (or at least we probably won’t).

Which is exactly what Billary Clinton’s Big-Money campaign contributors want us to believe: that no, we can’t. They want us to believe that so that we won’t even try.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Bill Clinton sucks anyway, Nutmeg

Meg Whitman, John McCain, Mitt Romney, Jeb Bush, ...

Associated Press photo

Billionaire bitch Nutmeg Whitman, pictured above with her Repugnican buddies John McCainosaurus, Jeb Bush and Mitt Romney at a fundraiser in April,  thinks that she can pit Demorcatic icon Bill Clinton against Democratic icon Jerry Brown. She won’t succeed in using Bill Clinton as a wedge, and her multiple lies about Jerry Brown’s record only underscore the fact that she has no fucking record of public service of her own.

Bill Clinton is in the news today. I wish that he’d just go the fuck away. But, true to his baby-boomer blood, he refuses to retire from the spotlight.

You’d think that after he had an intern give him head in the Oral — er, Oval Office, he’d have disappeared from public view in shame. But he knows no shame.

Bill Clinton resurfaced in a television commercial put out by billionaire Repugnican California gubernatorial Nutmeg Whitman in a rehashed clip of a television debate with Jerry Brown during the 1992 contest for the Democratic presidential nomination.

Clinton’s accusations against Brown in the clip from 1992 (“He raised taxes as governor of California. He had a surplus when he took office and a deficit when he left. He doesn’t tell the people the truth”) are wrong, according to The Associated Press, which today noted:

The source of Clinton’s criticism [of Brown in the 1992 clip] was a CNN report by Brooks Jackson, who issued a statement over the weekend on Factcheck.org saying he had mischaracterized Brown’s record on taxes.

“Brown is right; I made a mistake in my 1992 report,” Jackson wrote.

Specifically, Jackson said he picked the wrong year in concluding that California’s state taxes were higher when Brown left office than in his first year.

The Associated Press also notes that “As governor from 1975 to 1983, Brown built the state’s surplus to $6 billion, but he and the Legislature spent much of it — about $4.4 billion — bailing out local governments and schools after [the school-tax-cutting] Proposition 13 passed.”

But Team Nutmeg has decided to run with the clip of Bill Clinton misspeaking on or lying about Brown’s gubernatorial record even after Clinton’s intentional or unintentional inaccuracies in the clip have been demonstrated.

Why?

Because there is Democratic Party icon Bill Clinton criticizing Nutmeg’s Democratic opponent Jerry Brown (even if Clinton is lying or mistaken), and Repugnicans gladly will shamelessly lie if they perceive that enough voters will buy it.

Of course, most of the fucktards who would vote for Megalomaniac Whitman hate Jerry Brown and Bill Clinton anyway, and California’s solid Democrats aren’t going to be swayed by a Nutmeg Whitman ad that attempts to pit Bill Clinton vs. Jerry Brown. Brown has solid Democratic support here in California.

Even so: Fuck Bill Clinton anyway.

He was a shitty president.

Clinton counter-criticizes those of us of the professional left, bragging about his having created a “Third Way,” which amounted to little more than the creation of Repugnican Lite that plagues us to this day in Barack Obama’s Clintonesque/milquetoast administration. And if Clinton’s “Third Way” was the way to go, why was the 2000 election so close that the BushCheneyCorp was able to steal it? (Did Bill Clinton the horndog invent the three-way, too, I wonder?)

And who was it who said that every time that a Democrat acts like a Repugnican, the voters will go ahead and vote for the Repugnican?

That’s about all that we’ve learned from Bill Clinton, who sorely needs to take up golf.

I don’t mind still hearing from Jimmy Carter, who at least didn’t have sex with any intern, that we know of — and who stuck to his progressive guns, even if it cost him re-election.

But sellout Bill Clinton sucks ass, and it’s long past time for him to take a long nap on a big bed of mothballs.

And Nutmeg Whitman — what a God-awful pathetic excuse for a human being. It’s not that hard for her to dredge up some negative TV clip regarding Jerry Brown because Jerry Brown has served the state of California for several years. He has a record that someone like Megalomaniac Whitman — who has no fucking political record to speak of (except for the fact that she is approaching the highest amount of personal funds ever spent on a poltical campaign, more than $100 million thus far and behind only New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg) — can distort.

Nutmeg hasn’t held a single elected office, not even city council member, and most of the time she can’t even be bothered to vote.

If Californians are stupid enough to elect  Nutmeg Whitman on the heels of Repugnican gubernatorial disaster-movie star Arnold Schwarzenegger — who is more moderate than is Nutmeg — then they deserve the even bigger disaster that they’ll get.

P.S. I’m so sick of the Clinton Dynasty that I gave Barack Obama money primarily during his primary campaign fight against Billary Clinton in order to knock her out of the race. And it’s too bad that he made her his secretary of state. We’ve had enough of the Clintons.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized