Cunter: ‘tea-partiers’ ‘cheerful,’ liberals ‘violent’

I wasn’t going to blog anymore tonight. Then I read Ann Cunter’s latest lie fest.

Cunter tries to make the case that liberals are violent racists.

It’s funny. In a sick and twisted way. Does she believe her own shit or does she have full awareness that she’s lying through her venom-dripping fangs?

Cunter begins with:

While engaging in astonishing viciousness, vulgarity and violence toward Republicans, liberals accuse cheerful, law-abiding Tea Party activists of being violent racists.

Oh, fuck, I wish that we liberals were violent! (And that the “tea party” fascists truly were “cheerful” instead of hating upon everyone who isn’t a conservative straight white person who identifies as a Christian — you know, the way our tea-bagging founding fathers wanted it to be.)

We liberals should have killed someone when George W. Bush blatantly treasonously stole the White House in late 200o after having lost the popular vote and the state of Florida, of which his brother just coinky-dinkily was governor (and of which the chief elections official just coinky-dinkily also had sat on his election campaign committee). When the unelected Bush regime launched its bogus Vietraq War for Big Oil and for Uncle Dick’s Halliburton, we liberals should have gone on a murderous fucking rampage.

But we didn’t.

Actually, the “tea party” dipshits aren’t widely accused of violence, even though Cunter goes on to beat the “tea-party” spittle story to death. They are, however, accurately widely accused of being racist.

Look at how many non-whites attend “tea party” gatherings. Why, if the “tea party” is a such a big tent, is that tent filled almost exclusively with white people?

And the New York Times reports that less than 1.5 percent of the audience of Faux “News” (which we might as well call the Tea Party Channel) is comprised of black viewers, while around 20 percent of CNN’s and MSNBC’s viewership is black. Why, do you suppose, that is? (Oh, yeah: because blacks are racist. Andrew Breitbart says so.)

Cunter also proclaims:

We also have evidence of liberals’ proclivity for violence in the form of mountains of arrest records. Liberal protesters at the 2008 Republican National Convention were arrested for smashing police cars, slashing tires, breaking store windows, and for possessing Molotov cocktails, napalm bombs and assorted firearms. (If only they could muster up that kind of fighting spirit on foreign battlefields.)

There were no arrests of conservatives at the Democratic National Convention.

Hmmm. My understanding is that the vast majority of those who actually smash police cars, slash tires, break store windows, etc., are anarchists, not liberals, and while I don’t know much about the anarchists, my understanding is that by definition they don’t like liberals, considering liberals to be part of the broken political system that they despise. Actually, I think that they hate any and all political systems, broken or otherwise. (Any anarchists there, feel free to correct me in the comments section if I’m wrong.)

But that aside, again, I only WISH that liberals actually would wreak havoc like Cunter claims they (we) do. Instead, they tend to be notoriously pussy, usually not even fighting back when they are physically attacked. Fucking peaceniks. (And, as Cunter points out, liberals don’t even like to slaughter Muslim babies for the profits of Big Oil in the names of freedom and democracy and God and Jesus and puppies and kittens and fluffy little bunnies and butterflies and marshmallows and cotton candy. Fucking treasonous liberals!)

And if there were no arrests of conservatives at the Democratic National Convention, well, since conservatives tend to be overly comfortable, overprivileged rich fucks, since they tend to sit at the top of the hierarchy, shitting and pissing upon others, what, exactly, do they have to protest? (Oh, yeah: taxes, which the rich fucks’ corporations — which are people just like you and me, don’t you know — don’t even pay anyway. [Oh — and the black guy won the 2008 presidential election over the old white guy by 7 percentage points, when U.S. history clearly has demonstrated that only white men should ever be president.])

But wait. Cunter’s not done.

“It was a good day when George Bush was merely burned in effigy, compared to Hitler or, most innocuously, compared to a monkey,” she whines.

OK, so go to Google images — — and look up “Obama monkey” and “Obama Hitler.” You’ll see lovely images like these:

(You can Google “Obama burned in effigy” on your own. And you know, you’re no one until you’re burned in effigy. Just sayin’.)

It seems to me that blacks are much more often compared to monkeys or other non-human primates than are whites, and that whites comparing blacks to monkeys is quite different from mostly whites comparing a white guy to a monkey*, and really, I don’t think that the right or the left has a monopoly on the trite Hitler comparison, although if Barack Hussein Hitler truly wants to round up and exterminate six million “tea-partying” wingnuts, hey, I’m down with that. (But that will never happen, the FEMA concentration-camp conspiracy stories notwithstanding, because, as I said, liberals are pussies.)

Cunter even manages to scrape together some names of Democratic politicians who have made racist or racist-sounding statements in the past, and, of course, she has to mention that the late Democratic Sen. Robert Byrd in his youth used to be a member of the KKK, which he spent the rest of his life regretting and denouncing. (Well, she doesn’t remind us that he was young and that he regretted it the rest of his life. An oversight, I’m sure.)

Cunter neglects to mention Repugnican racist politicians like Strom “Baby Daddy” Thurmond, Trent Lott (whose political career imploded when he stated that segregationist Thurmond should have been elected president in 1948), George “Macaca” Allen, Jeff(erson) Sessions, John Ashcroft, George Bush I (remember the Willie Horton ad?) and George Bush II (remember the robo-calls that John McCain had fathered a black child, which had Karl Rove’s greasy fingerprints all over them? And how helpful Bush II was to the black victims of Hurricane Katrina?), Katherine Harris (and her purging of black voters from Florida’s voter rolls so that Bush II could “win” Florida), and, of course, David Duke. (Cunter actually writes that we liberals “have zero examples of conservative racism.” Uh, smoking dope isn’t legal yet, Ann.)

And these “incidents”/incidents of liberal-on-conservative violence/“violence” that Cunter recounts are, as violence goes, pretty tame. And quite anecdotal — hardly a fucking national pandemic, unfortunately. The worst of them she recounts is that a guy at a event bit off a portion of a wingnut’s finger.

Again, cool shit like that doesn’t happen nearly enough.

I wonder what one of Cunter’s fingers tastes like. Careful, though, my fellow violent liberals. I’m guessing that she has acid for blood.

*I used to love the comparisons of George W. Bush to a chimpanzee, although the comparisons were an insult to the intelligence of our closest living cousins.

The comparisons of Bush to chimps was a statement on his lack of intelligence, however. The prime aim of comparisons of blacks to non-human primates, however, is to suggest that they are subhuman — and thus, that it’s justified to treat them as such. 

Big difference. But just another innocent oversight on Cunter’s part, I’m certain.


Filed under Uncategorized

6 responses to “Cunter: ‘tea-partiers’ ‘cheerful,’ liberals ‘violent’

  1. Dabir Dalton

    Hitler was a Fascist {Fascism: an authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government.) who championed the rights of the corporations over the common citizens…So historically it is incorrect to picture Obama as Hitler whose political descendants and current champions of fascism are today as known conservative republicans.

    On the other hand since Obama is a socialist {Socialism being a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole. ->(in Marxist theory) a transitional social state between the overthrow of capitalism and the realization of Communism.} it would be far more historically accurate to picture the anointed one as Lenin…

    Either way before it is all over with the good ole u s of a will produce either a Hitler or a Stalin just as Germany and Russia did in the 20th century…

    • robertdcrook

      The overwhelming majority of murderous tyrants have been right wing, world history has shown us. The overwhelming majority of political violence, period, in world history has been right wing-on-left wing and not vice-versa.

      Obama is NOT a socialist. I can’t believe you blindly parrot that bullshit. (Or maybe you were just quoting the wingnuts and aren’t actually asserting that Obama is a socialist. I’m not sure.) At best, Obama is a little bit left of center, but overall quite centrist. It takes balls to be a socialist, especially here in the U.S. (We have exactly one socialist in the U.S. Congress.)

      I agree that the U.S. is ripe for a Hitler or Stalin, both of whom were right wing. The “tea party” is such fascism in its infancy or adolescence.

  2. Dabir Dalton

    Go back and read the the definition of socialism I posted in my last post then consider Obama’s takeover of health care and where it will eventually lead along with his takeover of General Motors and the banking industry…

    Stalin was definitely left wing and murdered far more Jews, Russians and Eastern Europeans then Hitler ever did…Then there is Pol Pot and China both communist and leftists who consistently murder and oppress their own people…Pol Pot in the past and China in both its past and the present…

    • robertdcrook

      You are like Cassandra on crack.

      We’ll never reach socialism under Barack Obama. We’ll be corporatocracy for some time to come. Under Obama’s health care “reform” the corporations got reined in just a little. They’ll still be profiting filthily from people’s pain and suffering. I don’t cry for the bankers, either. They’ll be just fine.

      You act as though socialism is a bad thing when unbridled capitalism has brought our nation to the brink of collapse.

      And it’s way, way melodramatic to compare Obama to Stalin.

      Jesus fuck.

  3. Joanaroo

    I love your blog, Robert, and am, like you, more than fed up with the GOP, Religious Right, Faux News, Breitbart, the House and Senate Rethugs, all the Rethug pundits, etc. As far as I’m concerned, they can all go take a nice, long dip in the Gulf of Mexico Tar Pits. And stay there! Maybe we’ll be lucky and the rich Rethugs will buy a deserted island somewhere and go there forever! I’m so fed up with their lies, cheating, arrogance, hypocrisy and just plain bullshit!

    • robertdcrook

      I am happy that you like my stuff.

      You know, if all of us on the left only fought like those on the right do, we’d win in short order. But we’re too timid to own our own power. Truth is on our side and that’s all that we need. But we don’t trust enough in that.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s