Daily Archives: February 6, 2010

Time for another ‘revolution,’ Sarah? No, time for another civil war!

Former vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin addresses attendees ...

Associated Press photo

A snarling Sarah Palin-Quayle appears as the keynote speaker at the Wingnut Super Bowl in Nashville, Tenn., today. She apparently has called for a “revolution” against the nation’s first democratically elected White House administration since the Clinton administration, and while the Bush regime’s having run up the federal budget deficit to a record level was perfectly OK, the Obama administration’s spending on people instead of on the Perpetual War Machine Palin-Quayle dubbed “generational theft.” Because clearly, the party and the ideology that denies the problem of global warming and that stokes the fires of anti-American hatred in the Middle East by killing thousands upon thousands of innocent people there cares so much about future generations.

Queen Wingnut Sarah Palin-Quayle told the “tea party” fanatics at their national convention today that “America is ready for another revolution” and that the “tea party” “movement” “is about the people.”

Oh, except that the majority of the people elected Barack Obama, and not her and John McCainosaurus, in November 2008 — radical right-wing Repugnican Tom Tancredo’s complaint that we didn’t first have to pass a “civics literacy test” notwithstanding.

So apparently we, the majority of the people of the United States of America (53 percent of us) who voted for Barack Obama, aren’t really “the people.”

Only those who agree with Sarah Fucking Palin-Quayle and her “tea-partying” ilk are “the people.”

This comparison of the “tea party” “movement” to the American Revolution is uber bullshit.

What we are seeing is not a replay of the events that led up to the American Revolution, but a replay of the events that led up to the American Civil War.

See, I don’t view the wingnuts as “the people,” and they don’t view me and my kind — sane Americans who truly want liberty and justice for all, not just for certain demographics — as “the people.”

These are what you call irrefuckingconcilable differences, and they are the stuff that civil wars are made of.

And I’m ready for another civil war. Bring it on, bitches! Bring! It! On!

The wingnuts lost the November 2008 election fairly and squarely. They can’t fucking deal with it, so they’re claiming that they’re now under the “oppressive,” “socialist” Obama administration — against which they must “revolt.” Sarah Palin-Quayle’s calling for a “revolution” — when the majority of Americans voted for Barack Obama, does that not smell like treason?

The “tea party” nutjobs are not victims. They simply lost the fucking 2008 presidential election, and they lost it by a margin too large for them to be able to steal it, like they stole the 2000 presidential election and quite possibly the 2004 election as well. It’s called a “democracy,” fucktards. Get over it, sore losermen.

Palin-Quayle also sneered to her adoring all-white crowd: “How’s that hope-y, change-y stuff workin’ out for you?”

Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!

Except that her party, the Repugnican Party, is the party that put our nation in its mess now. It is as though “President” George W. Bush never were behind the wheel (like a drunk) at the White House from January 2001 to January 2009.

But if we can act as though the wingnuts are poor oppressed people like the American colonists were poor oppressed people under the British monarchy, I suppose that we also can just pretend that the time period from January 2001 to January 2009 never fucking happened, and that Barack Obama picked up right where Bill Clinton left off.

That’s how detached from reality Sarah Palin-Quayle and her mouth-breathing followers are.

Most Americans who voted for Barack Obama in November 2008 — those Americans who have some idea as to what reality is and who thus never would attend a “tea party” function — did not expect him to reverse the severe damage that the unelected Bush regime caused from January 2001 to January 2009 overnight.

Most Americans are willing to give the president whom they actually elected this time the time to fix the nation’s dire problems, and they are not willing to participate in the “revolution” that Sarah Fucking Palin-Quayle speaks of. Palin-Quayle’s “vision” we already lived under for eight long nightmarish years, from January 2001 to January 2009.

Most Americans want the wingnuts to shut the fuck up and to stop putting their IEDs along the nation’s long, hard road to recovery. Doing everything possible to interfere with the nation’s recovery, and indeed, hoping that the current, actually-elected White House administration fails — again, I am catching a whiff of treason.

I am willing to defend my president — and “my president” is a phrase that I was unable to use from January 2001 through January 2009, since BushCheneyCorp blatantly stole the White House in late 2000, and since you cannot be “re”-elected if you never legitimately were elected in the first place — to my death.

Barack Obama is not perfect, and I certainly have been critical of him — mainly for being too timid to advance the progressive agenda — but he is our democratically elected president, our first democratically elected president since Bill Clinton, and I will allow the wingnuts to again take the White House that does not belong to them over my dead body.

Millions of my fellow Americans agree with me, Sarah Palin-Quayle, so fuck your “revolution” and ask yourself if you and your FUCKING RETARDED supporters really can win a rematch of the Civil War.

Advertisements

4 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

Sarah Palin-Quayle, grand dragoness

“Tea party” convention headliner Repugnican Sarah Palin-Quayle greets adoring supporters in an excellent PhotoShop job.

President-wannabe Sarah Palin-Quayle wrote this in a public relations — er, opinion — piece for USA Today before fellow radical-right Repugnican Tom Tancredo, a former U.S. representative from Colorado and former presidential hopeful who has used or at least tried to use xenophobic, anti-Latin-American-immigrant sentiment for personal political gain, opened the “National Tea Party Convention” in Nashville, Tenn., on Thursday:

Their vision is what drew me to the Tea Party movement. They believe in the same principles that guided my work in public service — whether I was working on the PTA and city council or serving as a mayor, commissioner or governor. I look forward to meeting some of these great Americans this weekend.

Probably at least in part because she’s no longer in public office, having quit her job as governor of Alaska before she served even one full term, Palin-Quayle apparently thought it sufficiently safe to appear at the Wingnut Super Bowl in Nashville today.

Other Repugnican elected officials who are still in office decided not to appear the “tea party” convention, afraid that some wingnut might say some really whack shit at the convention that would reflect poorly upon them. Or maybe the Repugnican National Committee made that decision for them.

In any case, some really whack shit was said at the convention, right off.

This is what Tancredo (who, like fellow wingnuts Samuel Alito and Antonin Scalia* [both U.S. Supreme Court “justices”], is an Italian American; now that their families got to immigrate to the U.S., we should hermetically seal our borders, you see) said in his opening speech for the convention on Thursday:

“…And then, something really odd happened, mostly because I think [that] we do not have a civics literacy test before people can vote in this country. [Big applause from his audience.] People who could not even spell the word “vote” or say it in English [more big applause] put a committed socialist ideologue in the White House — [his] name is Barack Hussein Obama.” [More applause.]

You can watch the clip on Rachel Maddow’s show here.

So Tancredo, who is able to say whatever he wants to say because his political career is dead anyway — really, you can’t be a one-trick hater-pony like he is and get anywhere — has bashed the 53 percent of Americans who voted for Barack Obama in 2008. He has alleged that because of low intellect and ignorance and/or a language barrier, Obama is our president.

That’s pretty fucking funny, since wingnuts are notorious for being fucktards. Like this one:

(I should note that I Googled “get a brain morans,” and from what I can tell, the viral images of the white-trash fucktard with that sign apparently are authentic images of an authentic wingnut.**)

And, as I noted waaaaay back in 2002, the same fucktarded haters who call for a “civics literacy test” (actually, “civics test” is just fine; there is no need to add the word “literacy” in there) for those from other nations (usually from nations within Latin America, since their skin usually is brown) or even for fellow American citizens (that is, black Americans) could not pass the same fucking civics test that immigrants must pass to become an American citizen. (Seriously — see how many of the questions you can answer correctly yourself!)

Knowing his background, Tancredo’s hateful remarks yesterday most likely were aimed, at least primarily, at those from Latin America who want a better life, but his remarks are reminding those who know their U.S. history of the literacy tests that once were used to prevent black Americans from voting. Notes Wikipedia:

As used by the states, the literacy test gained infamy as a means for denying suffrage to African Americans. Adopted by a number of Southern states, the literacy test was applied in a patently unfair manner, as it was used to disenfranchise many literate Southern blacks while allowing many illiterate Southern whites to vote.

The literacy test, combined with other discriminatory requirements, effectively disenfranchised the vast majority of African Americans in the South from the 1890s until the 1960s. Southern states abandoned the literacy test only when forced to by federal legislation in the 1960s…. Since the passage of the civil rights legislation of the 1960s, black registration in the South has increased dramatically.

So Repugnican former Sen. Trent Lott of Mississippi in 2002 publicly mused that the nation would have been a lot better off had segregationist Strom Thurmond been elected president in 1948, and now, Repugnican former Rep. Tom Tancredo muses that he sures misses the good old days of the literacy tests.

And, as I have noted before, calling Obama a “Muslim” or insinuating that he is a Muslim by stating his middle name of Hussein, is simply code for “nigger,” as is “socialist.” (“Committed socialist idealogue,” then, would mean “biiiiig nigger.”) And the name Hussein, of course, is associated with former Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein, which is meant to associate Barack Obama with the “evildoers” of the Middle East. We whiteys are to be just as afraid of the niggers here as we are to be afraid of the sand niggers who hate us for our freedom, you see.)

But when you say that the “tea party” “movement” is all about (or at least largely about) white supremacism, the wingnuts crow that you’re wrong. But listen to the “tea party” convention crowd’s reaction to Tancredo’s racist, xenophobic clarion call for a “civics literacy test”; the crowd eats it up.

After Rachel Maddow shows the clip, she quips, “Although to be fair, it was sort of hard to tell exactly what the sounds coming from the crowd meant; they were sort of, a little bit muffled by the — you know, the white hoods.”

Yup. The “white hoods” joke is appropriate, but I believe that Maddow was kidding; it is clear from the clip that Tancredo had a doting audience, clapping and laughing and whooping in response to his comments.

So when Sarah Palin-Quayle, the keynote speaker of this weekend’s “National Tea Party Convention” in Nashville, gushes about the “tea party” “movement,” as she did in USA Today

Later this week I’ll head to Nashville, where I’ll have the honor of speaking with members of the “tea party” movement. I look forward to meeting many Americans who share a commitment to limited government, common sense and personal responsibility….

— it’s bullshit.

Things like “common sense” and “personal responsibility” and “limited government” are the “tea party” “movement’s” stated raison d’être (hey, look, this American who cast his vote for Barack Obama not only can spell the word “vote,” but he can mix it up with a foreign language sometimes, too!), and those things sure sound good — but the “tea party” actually is about white supremacism and patriarchy and misogyny and “Christo”fascism/theocracy and militarism (to spend any of our tax dollars on people instead of on war profiteers is deemed “socialist”) and xenophobia and jingoism and homophobia and ignorance and fear.

The “tea party” is comprised mostly of stupid, backasswards white men who can’t get over the fact that rapidly changing demographics in the United States of America are making it more and more impossible for the stupid white man to have the political control of the nation that he used to have.

There are some fucktarded white women, like Palin-Quayle, who support these fucktarded white men, but the “tea party” “movement” irrefutably is stupid-white-male driven. 

The “tea party” “movement” represents a small slice of the American electorate, and even that small slice is melting just like the polar ice caps are melting. Just as the “tea party” fucktards deny that the ice caps are melting, they seem to be in denial that their existence is endangered, too. They have become the dinosaurs that they don’t believe in.

So you have the “National Tea Party Convention’s” opening act, Tom Tancredo, call for a “civics literacy test,” and you have Palin-Quayle gushing about how great the “tea party” “movement” is before she goes to Nashville to be the keynote speaker at their first national convention.

How can we not associate Palin-Quayle with the rest of what has gone on at the Wingnut Super Bowl this weekend when she herself has chosen to associate herself with it?

*Well, Scalia’s father was an immigrant from Sicily and his mother was born in the U.S. to Italian immigrants. (Sicily, Italy — close enough…) Alito’s father was an immigrant from Italy. Wikipedia says of Tancredo, “Both sets of his grandparents emigrated from Italy.”

So it was OK to let all of these Italians and Sicilians into the United States, you see, but we need to keep the Latin Americans, especially the brown-skinned ones, out.

**I cannot vouch for the authenticity of this image, however:

Respect Are Country - Speak English

2 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized